Muscle architecture properties of the deep region of the supraspinatus: A cadaveric study
Wu IT, Hyman SA, Norman MB, Sendek G, Powell JJ, Kirchberg TN, Berry DB, Lane JG, Singh A, Ward SR.
Orthop J Sports Med, 2024 12(10):23259671241275522.
Orthop J Sports Med, 2024 12(10):23259671241275522.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The supraspinatus is most frequently involved in rotator cuff tears, a common orthopaedic condition. However, the architecture of this muscle has been described only for the superficial, anterior, and posterior regions.
PURPOSE: To determine the muscle architecture of the deep supraspinatus.
STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: Muscle architecture measurements were collected from 25 cadaveric supraspinatus specimens (13 intact [without tendon tears], 3 with partial-thickness tears, 9 with full-thickness tears). The muscle was divided into deep, superficial anterior, and superficial posterior regions. Pennation angle, raw and normalized fiber length, and sarcomere length and number were compared using repeated-measures analyses of variance.
RESULTS: First, mean architecture measurements were compared between regions using only the intact specimens (n = 13). The deep region had a lower mean pennation angle (3.3° ± 1.0°) compared with the posterior region (11.0° ± 3.9°; P < .0001), which in turn had a significantly higher pennation angle compared with the anterior region (7.6 ± 2.6°; P = .0005). Normalized fiber lengths in the deep region were 21.1% (P = .0052) and 34.5% (P < .0001) shorter than the posterior and anterior normalized fiber lengths, respectively. Sarcomere lengths in the deep region were longer (3.4 ± 0.2 µm) compared with the posterior (3.1 ± 0.2 µm; P = .0012) and anterior (3.2 ± 0.2 µm; P = .0390) regions. Sarcomere numbers also decreased in the deep region by 21.2% (P = .0056) and 34.2% (P < .0001) compared with the posterior and anterior regions, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The deep supraspinatus had significantly lower pennation angles, shorter fiber lengths, and fewer but longer sarcomeres in series compared with other subregions within the muscle. These structural differences suggest a functionally unique "submuscle" within the supraspinatus.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the architecture of the supraspinatus muscle can provide insight into muscle function in health and disease. Specifically, this deep submuscle may play a different role in rotator cuff function than the rest of the muscle.
Full text (pdf)
PURPOSE: To determine the muscle architecture of the deep supraspinatus.
STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: Muscle architecture measurements were collected from 25 cadaveric supraspinatus specimens (13 intact [without tendon tears], 3 with partial-thickness tears, 9 with full-thickness tears). The muscle was divided into deep, superficial anterior, and superficial posterior regions. Pennation angle, raw and normalized fiber length, and sarcomere length and number were compared using repeated-measures analyses of variance.
RESULTS: First, mean architecture measurements were compared between regions using only the intact specimens (n = 13). The deep region had a lower mean pennation angle (3.3° ± 1.0°) compared with the posterior region (11.0° ± 3.9°; P < .0001), which in turn had a significantly higher pennation angle compared with the anterior region (7.6 ± 2.6°; P = .0005). Normalized fiber lengths in the deep region were 21.1% (P = .0052) and 34.5% (P < .0001) shorter than the posterior and anterior normalized fiber lengths, respectively. Sarcomere lengths in the deep region were longer (3.4 ± 0.2 µm) compared with the posterior (3.1 ± 0.2 µm; P = .0012) and anterior (3.2 ± 0.2 µm; P = .0390) regions. Sarcomere numbers also decreased in the deep region by 21.2% (P = .0056) and 34.2% (P < .0001) compared with the posterior and anterior regions, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The deep supraspinatus had significantly lower pennation angles, shorter fiber lengths, and fewer but longer sarcomeres in series compared with other subregions within the muscle. These structural differences suggest a functionally unique "submuscle" within the supraspinatus.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the architecture of the supraspinatus muscle can provide insight into muscle function in health and disease. Specifically, this deep submuscle may play a different role in rotator cuff function than the rest of the muscle.
Full text (pdf)